...is
scheduled as the guest speaker for the 306th meeting of the Karl Hess Club, to convene
on October 21, 2019.
Speaker TBA on
"Brexit 2.0."
Is they is, or is they ain’t? Brexit may be the
most fraught moment in British history, save perhaps for the Battle of
Britain. As this is written on October 11, Parliament is once again
prorogued, though this time not contested in the UK Supreme Court
(itself a very recent invention in the long and storied tradition of
English jurisprudence and not without controversy).
The earlier prorogation of Parliament was
pronounced by the Chief Justice of the court, (Baroness) Lady Hale,
illegal and a product of the Prime Minister misleading the Monarch on
its merits. This time, the recess is of a more modest and traditional
duration leading up to the Queen’s Speech and the ceremonial reopening
of Parliament Monday October 14.
The projected date for Leaving is the
appropriately mystical All Hallows’ Eve, Thursday October 31. Prime
Minister Boris Johnson will need all the magic he can conjure to
effect this result. Powerful forces, some seen and some unseen, are at
work to militate against this aim. The man called “the British Donald
Trump” has his work cut out. He is labouring furiously to fashion a
withdrawal agreement that satisfies both a recalcitrant EU bureaucracy
and a UK Parliament leaning toward a remain position.
A variety of scenarios present themselves,
especially given all the many moving parts. While a General Election
is increasingly imminent, there is even the prospect of a change of
Government without the benefit of the popular franchise. As a matter
of law, following the results of the Referendum of 2016 on the
question of the disassociation of the UK from the European Union,
Article 50 of the EU compact, which sets out how constituent states
may secede, must be invoked, severing this union. Three years and two
exhausted prime ministers later, this is yet undone, the will of the
British people instill in doubt.
Even though BoJo is the man of the moment, or
at least, the man on the spot, arguably the truly transformational
figure in the midst of this crisis, perhaps looming in Churchillian
stature, is the bully boy architect of Brexit himself, Nigel Farage.
His Brexit Party has had an enormous effect on the British electorate,
perhaps most notably on the Labour stronghold Midlands. Farage favors
what he terms a “Clean Break” Brexit which would deliver Great Britain
to the world economy on WTO terms, arguably preferable to edicts
issued from Brussels.
For his part, and party, Farage leads a phalanx
of MP candidates ready to stand constituencies across the Isles. They
are ready to contest an election on their own which could conceivably
split the Tory vote endangering their government and BoJo’s
premiership, or as Farage has offered, protect Conservative Leave
districts and combine with BoJo in what would become a Tory-Brexit
coalition dedicated to a no ifs, no buts Brexit.
Ever present is the specter of a Labour (or
Labour led coalition) government helmed by Jeremy Corbyn, a fate that
would almost certainly scuttle Brexit altogether.
Corbin and the Remainers in Labour (and some
Conservatives) favor a second referendum which Farage has disparaged
as choosing between “Remain or Remain” and which Corbyn promises his
regime would deliver. The deal that Johnson is shopping in Brussels is
not given much more credence than that of former PM Teresa May, which
failed three times to pass Parliament and was prevented from getting a
fourth vote by House of Commons Speaker John Bercow.
What is ultimately at stake is the basic
sovereignty of the British people, with the power to control their own
borders, negotiate trade deals, protect their fishing rights and
regulate their economy and society free from the oppressive strictures
of the EU bureaucracy. To hard core Brexiteers, “leave means leave!”
Among the obstacles in the way is the Benn
Bill, authored by Hilary Benn, Labour M.P., son of Labour Party icon
Anthony Benn. This states that the UK may not exit the EU without an
agreement. Also mandated is an extension to the date of Brexit (i.e.,
the date could be pushed into 2020 and beyond if there is no
acceptable agreement.
According to BrexitCentral, “Benn’s Bill states
that unless a deal is reached with the EU or Parliament approves a
no-deal Brexit by October 19th, the Government would be required to
write to the EU seeking an extension to the Article 50 period until
January 31st 2020 – a further Brexit delay that would take us to a few
months shy of four years since the referendum.”
BoJo has maintained that “Britain is leaving on
October 31, no ifs or buts” suggesting a constitutional crisis in the
absence of an agreement. A possible complication is that the UK has no
written Constitution, but rather a raft of traditions. The weight and
import of the relatively young Supreme Court is in doubt as to its
efficacy in the face of a challenge by the Government benches.
If all of this were not enough there is the
extremely knotty problem of the boundary between Northern Ireland and
the Republic of Ireland (Eire). Once Brexit happens, if it does, the
Schengen Treaty will apply, making this a hard border between the EU
(of which Republic of Ireland will still be a member) and Northern
Ireland.
The so-called “Backstop” under the May deal was
supposed to solve this issue but nobody on any side was satisfied,
especially the Irish on both sides of the boundary. The best BoJo has
offered so far is customs stations “far from the border” and no
infrastructure.
On the bright side, there is late news that
BoJo and the Irish Taoiseach (prime minister) Leo Varadkar, had a
positive meeting on the border question, so there is some optimism.
Very late reportage has a productive meeting between EU Brexit
negotiator Michel Barnier and UK Secretary of State for Brexit Stephen
Barclay, so that suggests some movement.
By the time of the eMinder, we will know more
about the prospects of an on time Brexit, whether “orderly and in
agreement” or “clean break.” If it seems that the saga will continue
beyond the end of October, we will schedule another meeting dedicated
to this subject at a suitable juncture. Questions to be answered
include what economic ramifications Brexit will have on the economies
of the UK, the EU, the US and the global economy. What political
fallout might obtain for the Europeans Project if other countries
consider divorce? Other concerns driving uncertainty include the issue
of EU subjects residing in Britain and UK expats on the Continent.
Disruptions expected on the trade front also have dampened markets.
In any case, Britain’s Brexit travail provides
a cautionary tale for any state considering a supranational combine
with other states, especially where affinities such as a common
language, traditions, values, etc. are absent. It might be recalled
too that the EU started as a simple “common market” trade agreement
and grew into a leviathan that has greatly exceeded its original
intent.
About
the Speaker
Efforts are underway to secure a speaker on this topic qualified
by our standards. If such a person is not selected by the time of
the eMinder, there still will be a meeting.
If there is no featured speaker, no dues will
be collected.
Meanwhile, we commend to you Nigel Farage’s
new YouTube program and many other videos devoted to the subject of
Brexit. There also has been a boom in publication of books on the
subject. Scroll down below to the email we received from the Brexit
Party to easily access Nigel’s show.
Your humble Senior Facilitator, Mike Everling, as a United States
citizen, can only be an interested observer of this process. While I
am a supporter, in favor of a clean break Brexit, it is as a moral
supporter only. I have not and will not contribute monetarily to the
Brexit Party or to any other entity involved in a foreign political
activity. However, the KHC is open to those with opposing views, even
as invited speakers.
|